Annotated bibliography
A brief summary done about selected articles
By
Najlaa S. Al-Ghamdi
MA Candidate, King Khalid University
Supervised by
Dr. Abdulaziz Fageeh
December 2014
Introduction
Nowadays, technology is
a new field that becomes very important in teaching and learning. Most
educators and researchers call for using smart devices and applying technology
widely in all educational institutions. Technology in education was considered
as a topic that under consideration amongst the society all over the world.
Everyone had their own views on modernizing education and making it technology
aided. There were a huge number of positives and negatives effects and impacts
on education technology. No one can deny that technology and education are a
great combination if just used together with a right reason and vision. As a
result of rapid changes in the computer and media industries, most universities
and educational institutions are forced to re-envision ways of incorporating
technology in administrative and educational functions. But, we still have some
difficulties and troubles in generalizing, using smart devices in the education
process for all learners.
In this task, I need to
select ten articles or books to be summarized. The chosen items should be
related to language and technology to show how using technology can help to
facilitate the pedagogic process that develops the outcomes of students.
Consequently, the choice of technology along with its competence can give the
utmost benefit to learners.
(1) L2 writing practice:
Game enjoyment as a key to engagement. Language
Allen, L. K., Crossley, S. A., Snow, E. L.,
& McNamara, D. S., (2014). L2 writing practice: Game enjoyment as a key to
engagement. Language Learning & Technology, 18 (2), 124–150. Retrieved from
http://llt.msu.edu/issues/june2014/varneretal.pdf
The
article discussed how to use perfectly educational games and writing strategy
program to attract more L2 learners. The study applied on a sample of both L1
and L2 participants as they show equal response. Both increases their knowledge
and writing performance. It presents a new methodology to convince learners to
learn more indirectly through enjoyment and playing as they consider they spend
their spare time, but in fact they learn without paying attention, how much
time they spend. This study just needs some more applications and improvements
to be more qualified and convenient for a large scale of L2 learners. As it’s
designed to attract the young learners only, but if it is activated to be
suitable for the older ones, it could be used easily in different educational
sectors.
(2) ICALL for improving
Korean L2 writers’ ability to edit grammatical errors.
Cowan,
R., Choo, J. & Lee, G. S. (2014). ICALL for improving Korean L2 writers’
ability to edit grammatical errors. Language Learning & Technology, 18(3),
193–207.
This
article shows an approach applied on the Korean learners as second English
language learners by using Computer Assisted Language Learning (ICALL) program
to improve their grammar awareness and grammatical correction skills which pay
their attention towards the errors and its correction. They pass through a life experience following
a specific experiment through following the instructions and discovering the errors,
then correct it so it sounds such self- learning.The outcomes depend on the
errors through four persistent such the passive form. In my opinion, this
article highlights the impact of the ICALL courseware can raise second English
language learners’ awareness in writing. Also it helps them to recognize and
correct these errors. But, it neglects the communication skills between the
second language learners and the native speakers plus it couldn’t be used with
young learners.
(3) Ubiquitous Learning:
Determinants Impacting Learners’ Satisfaction and Performance with Smartphones.
Jung, H.-J. (2014). Ubiquitous Learning:
Determinants Impacting Learners’ Satisfaction and Performance with Smartphones. Language
Learning &Technology, 18 (3), 97–119. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/issues/october2014/jung.pdf
This article discusses technology application
in learning language such smart phones as it has many features such the low
cost of mobile internet services based on wireless broadband (WiBro) and
high-speed downlink packet access (HSDPA). So, many countries do their best in
applying CALL & CMA. The study applied to show that the current language
learners are mainly influenced by high technology, software, and CMA in
language acquisition as it could attract a wide range of them such what occurred
with a sample of Korean learners. Since the findings indicate that there’s a
dramatic increasing of the popularity of you- English learning among Koreans.
The study was so precious, especially for attracting youth to learn second language,
but it ignores the individual differences towards technology as it depends
mainly on the learners’ ability in using some software.
(4) Establishing an
empirical link between computer-mediated communication and SLA: A meta-analysis
Lin, H. (2014). Establishing an empirical link
between computer-mediated communication and SLA: A meta-analysis. Language
Learning & Technology, 18 (3), 120–147. Retrieved from
http://llt.msu.edu/issues/october2014/lin.pdf
This article indicates the relation
between CMC and SLA as it analyzes the comparison between the outcomes through
the current years and the outcomes before. The outcomes from most of primary
studies show a positive and a medium effect from CMC on SLA. The studies show
that applying technology in various types of activities and tasks could make a
difference in learning language, although they were carried out through 12 years,
which show a long time with a wide range of improvement and development, so the
comparisons between the same variables along this period wouldn’t be accurate and
reliable. That’s why this study is not reliable or accurate, so more approaches
are required for the following years to be a good source of estimation of the
real effect of CMA on SLA.
(5) An experimental
study of corrective feedback during video-conferencing.
Monteiro, K. (2014). An experimental study of
corrective feedback during video-conferencing. Language Learning &
Technology, 18 (3), 56–79.
This article deals with a very
effective strategy called corrective feedback. It implies for the relation
between the interaction hypothesis and corrective feedback so it’s applied on
the pronunciation production of the learners during the practical practice with
native speakers either in face-to-face conversations or through CMA. Then
there’s an evaluation of the learners’ response in the two groups, following by
a comparative parameter between them. Skype is chosen as suitable software for
this experiment as it’s so easy and popular for different learners. The results
show that it was perfect software and achieved significant goals. I think more
approaches are required in the near future to get more benefits about this strategy,
although this experiment is so precious to get a good base for educators to be
applied in the classroom.
(6)
Benefits of Visual Feedback on Segmental
Production in the L2 Classroom.
Olson, D. J. (2014). Benefits of Visual
Feedback on Segmental Production in the L2 Classroom. Language Learning &
Technology, 18 (3), 173–192. Retrieved from
http://llt.msu.edu/issues/october2014/olson.pdf
This article studies
the ability of generalization of pronunciation acquisition through VFP (Visual
Feedback Paradigm) as phonetics syllabus can be transferred by some strategies
such including auditory discrimination training, explicit articulatory
instruction, awareness training, high variability phonetic training and
mixed-approaches. It shows a significant effect on the learners and increases
their responses toward native accent. In my opinion, this article is very
beneficial as it provides the outcomes of the potential effectiveness of a
visual feedback paradigm which can be effectively applied in the classroom for
L2 learners. However, it doesn’t pay attention towards the other skills in
language acquisition such writing and word structure. Also, it doesn’t follow a
plan in a specific interval plus it focus only on Spanish learners.
(7)
University level second language readers ‘online reading and
comprehension strategies.
Park, J., Yang, J., & Hsieh, Y. C.
(2014). University level second language readers ‘online reading and
comprehension strategies. Language Learning & Technology, 18 (3), 148–172.
Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/issues/october2014/parkyanghsieh.pdf
This article presents an experiment on a
sample that reads online texts. It points out that the different backgrounds of
the learners would affect the learners’ response towards knowledge and
vocabulary of the second language plus their computer performance as both might
affect positively or negatively on their progress. The data collected by
observation, think-aloud protocols, and interviews. I think this study
demonstrates some issues such as the speed of the learners either in braining
storm or in applying on a computer keyboard. The lack of this study may relate
to be just applied on a sample of learners from Asia, who may study English
before, so it could be more effective if it was applied on Arab learners.
(8)
Effects of interactive chat versus independent
writing on L2 learning .
Tare, M., Golonka, E. M., Vatz, K., Bonilla,
C. L., Crooks, C., & Strong, R. (2014). Effects of interactive chat versus
independent writing in L2 learning. Language Learning & Technology, 18 (3),
208–227. Retrieved from
http://llt.msu.edu/issues/october2014/tareetal.pdf
This article studies
the impact of interaction in language acquisition by applying an approach on
two groups for the same interval with two different activities that shows the
difference between face-to-face and CMA interaction. This study was a good
solution for the learners who are shy and couldn’t interact face to face. Plus,
it gives the chance for the learners to practice more and daily. The final
outcomes show a very important feature; both groups gain the same content of the
vocabulary. In my opinion, it makes a progress for second language acquisition,
especially for the shy learners as it provides them a good chance to share in
conversation through chatting. However, it focuses only on speaking skill as a sector
of language acquisition.
(9)
Chinese EFL teachers' social interaction and socio-cognitive presence in
synchronous computer-mediated communication
Chinese
EFL teachers' social interaction and socio-cognitive presence in synchronous
computer-mediated communication. Language Learning & Technology, 18(3),
228–254. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/issues/october2014/wugaozhang.pdf
The article presents an experiment of three
Chinese teachers that assess a group for chatting as an activity for English
teachers only, but they surprise that most of Chinese learners with different
levels participate. They found in the beginning that many new users share them
even they don’t know them and they became fellow to them, which encourages them
to apply different strategies and pass some grammar rules through chatting. The
teachers use different measures s to study and analyze the cognitive presence
such “Elucidating”. Generally, the study was effective as it shows how to
attract different learners towards a specific language, although it depends
mainly upon the communication between teachers from different cultures and
chatting, it’s not suitable for the young ones.
(10) An exploratory study of pauses in
computer-assisted EFL writing.
Xu, C. & Ding, Y. (2014). An exploratory
study of pauses in computer-assisted EFL writing. Language Learning & Technology,
18 (3), 80–96. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/issues/october2014/xuding.pdf
The article discusses using computer assisted
in EFL writing. It gives the learners a chance to use their previous knowledge
plus the ability to use a dictionary either in their mother tongue or the
second language. The results show that this experiment by using pause strategy
had a good effect on their writing skill as all tasks and activities are evaluated
through computer programs. I think
pausing strategy is good for the learners who would like to prepare their ideas
and thoughts before sharing in any language skills. But, the outcomes may be
unfair and not reliable as there’s unequal experience with computers, which relies
mostly on each learner’s performance so it may reduce the ability of some
learners or could inhibit them.

No comments:
Post a Comment